Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patti Petersen's avatar

There's two of me. One wants Sierra Nevada mountain living and the other wants a more economical, socially oriented lifestyle that's right outside my front door. Who will win? Unless we hit the lottery (I don't play, Carl does) the latter or left side of (the one that harnesses the feminine energy) me wins, meaning the preparing for aging in place side, the one out of the US. If we're lucky the place we land will have elevation and socialization right out the front door.

It really strange. I'm surrounded by people that must be loaded. They spend money and travel like here's no end to the money-mobile. And, I've been chastised about my views on the last four years and the economy. I was harshly reminded I'm not an economist, and I'm not. But I'm certainly an expert on how far my spending takes me, and the energy it takes to keep my lifestyle going the way I like to thrive. You echoed so much of what swirls in my mind. This has a way of cheering me up when I start second guessing what I see and hear these days.

Expand full comment
A.M. Haus's avatar

Your numbers are consistently on par. The national median price for a house ($433,229.) is an accurate representation of a fixer-upper in a bad neighborhood around these parts of Northern California. My kids are looking to buy next year in a posh suburb/rural area in the hills, which carries the median starting price of $750,000. -if they can find one.

Their theory is to buy a property and let me build an ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit) which they admit will be the only way for me to build and afford something nice and in a good area. I find it sad that my kids have to think this way.. and more sad that it is true.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts